nerdy.nel’s new york-area transportation improvement plan (NYTIP): an introduction

UPDATE (07.21.2019): Added a link to the 7th post in this series. Check back regularly for more updates.

Over the years, I’ve given much thought to New York’s transportation infrastructure and how to improve it. While I mainly focused on subways, given my love of trains, I recently began thinking beyond the rails.

It’s no secret – NYC’s subway is in crisis. NY is always stuck in traffic. NY’s highways are a chief source of pollution and misery. Politicians blame bikes for car-caused congestion. And none of it’s getting any better. So how do we fix it?

Introducing the New York-area Transportation Improvement Plan (NYTIP)!

What is NYTIP, you ask? Simply put, NYTIP is my informal collection of ideas for improving New York’s transportation systems and infrastructure. I’ll present these ideas in a series of blog posts.

My motivation for starting this blog series came from many places – studying transit and highway maps, researching formal subway plans, proposals from the Regional Plan Association, discussions on Transit/Urbanist Twitter, ideas from Second Avenue Sagas, vanshnookenraggen, and others, and of course, my own ideas. This post will serve as an index for NYTIP; as I publish new posts on NYTIP, I’ll link to them here.

First, a disclaimer. I am not affiliated with any transportation agencies; however, I am affiliated with transit advocates, through my Transportation Alternatives and Rail Passengers Association memberships.

Now let’s get to the fun part!

VOLUME I: FIXING THE NYC SUBWAY SYSTEM

My first series of posts on NYTIP will address the broken NYC subway system. NYTIP prescribes a three-point plan for the NYC Subway, in this order:

  1. Enhance. Improve the NYC subway’s frequency and regularity by reducing merging conflicts throughout the system. This is known as “de-interlining”.
    1. Central Park West
    2. South Brooklyn
    3. Broadway and Queens Boulevard
    4. Eastern Parkway
    5. South Bronx
    6. Enhanced NYC Subway summary
    7. Overnight service and subway maintenance
  2. Extend. Extend NYC’s subway lines to increase the system’s reach.
  3. Expand. Build new subway lines to serve areas that the existing system doesn’t serve well, or at all.

The goal of this three-point plan is to allow each subway line to run at least every 4 minutes during peak hours and at least every 8 minutes during off-peak hours, including weekends. Regardless of current loading guidelines or service levels, this will be the new baseline for subway service, with higher-ridership routes receiving more frequent service. To make weekend service more reliable under NYTIP, almost all planned work will shift from weekends to the overnight hours through targeted line closures – essentially an expanded FASTRACK program. In exchange, each subway line that operates overnight will run every 15 minutes instead of every 20. Proper street management is key to making this transition a success, as line closures will require adequate substitutes; I’ll explore those later.

My next set of posts on NYTIP address point 1 (enhance); the first of these posts addresses the Central Park West trunk line (A, B, C, and D lines). Until next time!

11 thoughts on “nerdy.nel’s new york-area transportation improvement plan (NYTIP): an introduction

  1. I’ve always thought that during off-peak hours, it may be inefficient for MTA to run full-length trains at higher frequency on some lines… So they should do so with half-length trains. Especially overnight. And especially on the Staten Island Railway.

    I think SIR has the potential to be much more useful if there were 2-car trains every 15 (or 10) minutes rather than 4-car trains every 30. Get the bus system to make SIR connections with these higher frequencies, and we have a framework for improving public transportation in Staten Island.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Concerning shorter trains: it might work for overnight service, but I wouldn’t consider it at any other time; off-peak daytime ridership (even with the current ridership drop) is too high for short trains.

      As for Staten Island, the forthcoming ferry route to West Midtown may catalyze SIR service/ridership increases, so they should keep 4-car trains. That said, I do wonder if SIers would trade shorter trains for more frequent service until the new ferry route launches?

      Like

      1. Even then, with the SIR, I think that they should shoot for six- or five-minute headways before forming longer trains. Frequency is useful, y’know? In time, the frequency in itself might further catalyze ridership to justify bringing back longer trains, but let’s make trains more useful now.

        With regards to the subways, how ’bout the weekends? Not for all lines (the L is fine, for example lol), but I think they can stretch it out on some lines. This weekend, both my F train and my R train ran every 12 minutes. The J is similar.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Totally agreed on high frequency being useful, and I can see the SIR being a good test case for this. Weekends get tricky. My thinking for NYTIP was running full-length trains more frequently to encourage ridership and discourage driving, but I can see the merit of your points (and as someone who once regularly used the D – hardly a paragon of frequent service! – I feel your pain).

        Like

Discuss (Be respectful. No trolling or threats allowed; violators subject to moderation or ban. Thanks!)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s